MentorTech Ventures | Early Stage Venture Capital Fund

Posted September, 2009

Order Entries by:
  • (0 ratings)
    • Not yet rated.
    Posted by Samantha Sim, Sep 18, 2009

    TicketLeap Recognized as one of Philly’s Fastest Growing Companies


    We’re excited to announce that TicketLeap made the list of the top 150 nominees of the PHILADELPHIA 100, which recognizes the fastest growing, privately held companies in the Greater Philadelphia region.Philadelphia 100

    This nomination is truly meaningful because it emphasizes our continual growth – we are so happy that the TicketLeap family continues to grow and reach more and more milestones as a company.

    We’d also like to extend our congratulations to the other nominees, and look forward to celebrating everyone’s success at the main even on October 1st at the Annenberg Center.

    Published 18 September 2009 - 0 comments    Bookmark and Share
  • (0 ratings)
    • Not yet rated.
    Posted by Michael Aronson, Sep 01, 2009

    The Way I Work: Marc Lore of Diapers.com

    Meet the man who sells $89 million of diapers each year online

    Michael Lewis

    MIDNIGHT OIL: After he has eaten and put the kids to bed, Marc Lore relaxes with some spreadsheets.


    Courtesy subject

    MORNING GLORY: Lore likes to kayak before work. "When it's quiet," he says, "that's when I can focus."


    Michael Lewis

    MIDNIGHT OIL: After he has eaten and put the kids to bed, Marc Lore relaxes with some spreadsheets.

    Related Content

    Inc. Newsletter

    Marc Lore, the CEO of Diapers.com, has a thing for numbers. How many types of boxes should his warehouses carry? How big are his competitors' operating margins? How long is the lead time from vendors? Lore's obsession has paid off for Diapers.com, which he co-founded with his old friend Vinit Bharara. Last year, the one-stop shop for new parents sold $89 million worth of formula, wipes, baby gear -- and about 200 million diapers -- to 550,000 customers. Lore spends his days on the floor of the company's warehouse office in Montclair, New Jersey. Nights, after his kids are in bed, he holes up in his home office or sits at the kitchen table, poring over more numbers and refining his vision for the company's future.

    I usually get up at 6:15 and go running or kayaking at Mountain Lake, near my house. I'm usually back by 7:15, so I have a good hour in the morning to spend with my 
    kids -- Sierra, who is 9, and Sophia, who is 6 -- before they leave for school. My wife or I will cook; we'll have breakfast together. I see the kids off to their carpool at 8:15 and then leave for work.

    I live in Mountain Lakes, New Jersey, but my partner Vinit Bharara lives in New York City. Our office in Montclair is in the middle. The 25 minutes' driving to work, running, kayaking, the time before I fall asleep at night -- when it's quiet -- that's when I can focus. That's where the vision comes from.

    I get to the office around 9. Once Vinnie gets in, one of us always says, "You know, I was thinking last night…" We sometimes spend an hour or two debating ideas. We've usually thought about stuff independently overnight, so in the morning, we kind of download. We share an office, and our desks are right next to each other, so we talk there.

    Vinnie and I have been friends since we were 10. This is the second company we've started together. We complement each other really well in terms of the way we think: He's stronger verbally, and I'm stronger mathematically. It enables us to see both sidtes of every argument. Neither one of us is really stubborn. Often we'll argue one side, and then by the time the argument is over, we're arguing the other side. I think we often come to an answer that neither one of us would come up with alone.

    In a fast-growing company, there's a constant need for brainpower in varying parts of the business at different times. So Vinnie and I tend to pinch-hit in areas where we feel that we're weakest. Since we're constantly focusing on different areas of the business, every day is different.

    We don't have a lot of meetings. In meetings, there's really only a couple of people that are getting value out of it -- a telltale sign is when people start checking theirBlackBerrys. We also don't have department areas on the floor. As people join the company, they pick whatever seat they want. Most of the departments -- marketing, merchandising, accounting, technology -- are intermingled. People become friends; they sit next to one another. It breaks up the departmental politics. Vinnie and I only moved into our own office six months ago. Before that, we were sitting in cubicles like everybody else.

    We're constantly trying to minimize costs that don't pay dividends. One of the ways we communicate that to the staff is that we're very understanding when things don't get done. You can't say, "I want you to be lean, and I want you to get everything done." We are very clear that "Here are the three key priorities: These need to get done. If these other things don't get done, I understand." We have two people in the supply chain, three people in accounting and finance, three people in marketing. You have to have really great people to make that work.

    We'll probably hire 40 people this year to keep up with our growth. As we get bigger, I can't assume new hires know why decisions are getting made. During the day, I make five or six trips to the kitchen at the other end of our office. On my way, I try to talk to people one on one, solicit their questions, and reiterate our strategy as it pertains to them.

    All 25 of our customer service folks are in-house. We have a 24/7 operation, and we empower the reps completely to take care of the mom at whatever cost. Really, the fewer rules, the better. The concept is just if Mom calls and there's an issue, do whatever is necessary to make her happy and really wow her. (We got into the habit of referring to all of our customers as "Mom.") If we don't have a product you're looking for, we'll get it from a competitor. The day before yesterday, a mom really needed a car seat for the weekend, and there was no way UPS was going to get there on time, because UPS comes late on that particular day. But UPS comes to the customer service rep's home in the morning. So the rep had it shipped to her house in the morning, and then she drove it over to the mom's house. We're doing 6,000 orders a day, but that stuff still happens all the time.

    Our best customers get over-the-top treatment, even when there isn't an issue. If a really good customer calls in, and we see that they've ordered a lot from us and they've referred other moms to us, reps have the power to send them a $100 gift basket just to say thank you. We send them flowers, gift certificates to get a massage. We spend about $1 million a year on this, 10 percent of our marketing budget. I try to take calls myself once a quarter, but this year, I've probably only done it once so far.

    Vinnie and I go to lunch together basically every day. We get sashimi at this sushi place called Aozora in Montclair. We drive over together and spend 45 minutes or an hour talking, usually about things that are more confidential that we may not want to discuss in the office. When we get back, we spend the next half-hour or 45 minutes following up on that discussion.

    When we launched the company, our biggest competitors were already at scale. We knew early on that the key would be how fast we could ship stuff, what prices we could sell for, and how many product lines we could carry. Having my second kid and seeing my wife having to keep us in stock with diapers and formula and stuff -- it wasn't easy for her. I thought, If we could make this an easy experience for Mom, offer premium service and speedy delivery, we could extend into the other high-margin baby products.

    So before we launched, we built proprietary software from scratch. We built software with computational algorithms to determine what the optimal number of boxes to have in the warehouse is and what the sizes of those boxes should be. Should we stock five different kinds of boxes to ship product in? Twenty kinds? Fifty kinds? And what size should those boxes be? Right now, it's 23 box sizes, given what we sell, in order to minimize the cost of dunnage (those little plastic air-filled bags or peanuts), the cost of corrugated boxes, and the cost of shipping. We rerun the simulation every quarter.

    Using the right box probably adds close to 1 margin point. That may not seem like a lot, but the difference between a supersuccessful Internet retailer and a so-so Internet retailer is just a few margin points. Amazon has about a 4 percent operating margin, but they're at this massive scale. Anything less than massive, you have to be more efficient. The year we started, our gross margins were 4.6 percent. Today, they're in the teens.

    Still, I think there's a time to be analytical and there's a time to make decisions based on things that can't necessarily be analyzed. How do you analyze the impact of hand-delivering a car seat to a customer who needs it? How do you assess the negative impact to the business of a mom coming to the site and finding the product she wants out of stock? Selection, price, customer service, speed of delivery, in-stock rates, ease of shopping -- when it comes to any of those areas, I put analytics aside and work backward. I say, "Let's work with the most perfect thing we can do, the best possible consumer experience, and then now, analytically, let's try to figure out how to do that as efficiently as possible."

    I leave the office around 7 o'clock. These days, I tend to work after the kids go to bed as well. My kids are both involved with sports, and I don't think I've missed one of their games. It's important to fit that stuff in. I think I've struck a pretty good balance, but it's not always easy.

    Sometimes I eat dinner with the kids, sometimes not. Often it's close to their bedtime after I eat, so I will read them stories and put them to bed. Afterward, I catch up with my wife, talk about her day. Then, I go in to work. I have like a little mini office off the bedroom.

    At home, I'm doing work that doesn't involve other people. Stuff that takes time and silence. I don't really watch TV at all. I much prefer working. We're outsourcing our pay-per-click marketing, and we really weren't happy with the job that was being done, so I worked on that two or three hours a night for about six weeks. I've also been spending a lot of time on competitive analysis. I've gone through the Internet Retailer Top 500 Guide so many times that I can recite just about any stat of any company that's in there.

    I go to bed around 11 or 12. That's the one time when you're really doing nothing but thinking. We have a pretty lofty five-year plan, and I visualize the path over and over again. I try to think about what could throw it off, think through each quarter, each year, from here to there -- exactly how we're going to do it and what challenges and pitfalls we're going to face and preparing to deal with them before they happen. I don't know when I actually fall asleep, because when I wake up in the morning, it feels like a continuation of my thought from the previous night.


    Published 01 September 2009 - 0 comments    Bookmark and Share
  • (0 ratings)
    • Not yet rated.
    Posted by Samantha Sim, Sep 01, 2009


    Retinal photographs facilitate glaucoma diagnosis with new software
    Turns change into motion, allows comparison with historical data


    Ophthalmology Times


    New York—A new software program that automatically aligns digital retinal or optic nerve photographs taken several years apart and alternates them to allow clinicians to look for changes over time may improve the speed and accuracy of glaucoma diagnosis.

    The technology (MatchedFlicker, EyeIC), which received FDA 510(k) clearance in July, lets physicians go back in time to see whether the conditions of patients who have been followed for many years are getting worse.

    The gold standard for detecting glaucomatous change over time is to c ompare a series of stereo photographs taken several years apart. The new software builds on that standard by facilitating the identification of change over time from photographs, said Nathan Radcliffe, MD, director of glaucoma at Weill Cornell Medical College and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York.

    "The reason this is a big advantage is because [the software] allows you to continue using most of the assets that photographs have to offer. You can import photographs of the optic nerve taken 10 or 15 years ago and get a wealth of information into a given patient's past," Dr. Radcliffe said. "Because many ophthalmologists have been taking photographs in clinical practice for many years, [the software] allows us to capitalize on that wealth of historical data to manage our patients better today."

    The new software evolved from a series of patents that its maker acquired and augmented to develop its product.

    "You take two photographs and turn them into a movie that flickers back and forth. What that does is turn change into motion," said Ira Wallace, MD, chief executive officer of EyeIC. "The human visual system is very sensitive to seeing motion, especially if nothing else in the photograph is moving, so the doctor sees the changes between the photographs and needs to make the decision about whether those changes represent disease-associated progression or some other change."

    Although there are other means of performing automation flicker, such as putting two slide projectors next to each other or overlapping two digital photographs on a computer screen, the new software takes a more sophisticated approach because it automatically aligns photographs at a subpixel level, Dr. Radcliffe said.

    "There's a very high level of alignment, and it allows you to detect changes that would otherwise be undetectable," he added.

    For example, it has been reported that progression of peripapillary atrophy is associated with glaucomatous progression, but this association is extremely difficult to determine in side-by-side comparisons because the changes can be very small. Additionally, small changes in blood vessels along the neuroretinal rim of the optic disc can be very specific for glaucomatous progression, but these shifts also are quite small and difficult to see.

    Aligning the images

    "However, with [the software], since everything else about those two photographs has been aligned, changes in the optic disc blood vessels or peripapillary atrophy can be seen fairly easily," Dr. Radcliffe explained.

    Describing the way in which the software works, he said that the algorithm requires that the two photographs have at least 20% of the image in common. Even if the eye has undergone considerable change over the years, due to causes such as progressive cataract or retinal disease, the images typically still can be matched.

    In addition, digitized photos from any source can be used with the software.

    The software looks for any identifiable features in the photographs, such as the crossing of retinal or choroidal blood vessels or chorioretinal scars, and aligns the images along these features to achieve the best statistical match between the photographs. The physician then can determine the rate at which the two photographs are alternated to perceive the change over time. The software can magnify or rotate the images but applies the same changes to the whole photograph. The color and illumination are not affected by the algorithm.

    "The physician needs to be aware that changes in the cardiac cycle or differences in the angle from which the two photographs were taken can cause apparent change, which can be differentiated from true change with experience," Dr. Radcliffe said.

    He added that the software allows clinicians to look at a multitude of different features of the optic nerve, such as changes in the neuroretinal rim, the retinal nerve fiber layer, the blood vessels, the appearance of disc hemorrhages, or peripapillary atrophy. Most other imaging technologies enable users to look at one or two of those features but not all of them.

    Documentation tools

    The software includes documentation tools.

    According to Dr. Wallace, a mark made on a suspicious feature in any one of the aligned images automatically shows up in the corresponding area of every photograph so that the change immediately can be seen. The mark then can be annotated and printed or saved to an electronic medical record. The images can also be shared with other clinicians.

    Dr. Radcliffe said he has used the software in several research studies to look for glaucomatous change over time and found that the images are quite dramatic.

    "When you see glaucomatous progression happening in front of your face, it's quite impressive. I've found it to be a great teaching tool. There's also some thought that this might be useful to show to patients to get them more involved in their disease process and help with compliance," he said.

    "Since glaucoma is a disease of change, [the software] has a specific role in detecting glaucoma, although it could be used for other retinal diseases as well," Dr. Radcliffe concluded. 

    Published 01 September 2009 - 0 comments    Bookmark and Share